Infrastructure/fedora-infrastructure

Fork 0

Get teams.fp.o to allow access to projects at a default level for anyone with a FAS #7826

New issue

Closed

opened 2019-05-23 10:16:26 +00:00 by bex · 22 comments

bex commented

2019-05-23 10:16:26 +00:00

This will require consultation with our teams.fp.o hoster.

jperrin commented

2019-05-23 13:59:09 +00:00

Can you explain a bit more about your request and the thinking behind it?

I'm concerned that this would create confusion between individual boards/projects vs Fedora approved(for lack of better term) ones.

Can you explain a bit more about your request and the thinking behind it? I'm concerned that this would create confusion between individual boards/projects vs Fedora approved(for lack of better term) ones.

bex commented

2019-05-23 14:06:00 +00:00

Author

I do not view teams.fedoraproject.org as a place to host individual non-Fedora related boards. The teams really need a way to get people on-boarded that doesn't require constant manual maintenance. The default in almost all areas of our project is open commenting. We need this here too, in my opinion.

puiterwijk commented

2019-05-23 14:25:24 +00:00

Right now, the Taiga OIDC plugin doesn't even request group membership information.
While that bit is easy to solve, it would then also need hooking up to the taiga internals for some kind of mapping.

Right now, the Taiga OIDC plugin doesn't even request group membership information. While that bit is easy to solve, it would then also need hooking up to the taiga internals for some kind of mapping.

bex commented

2019-05-23 14:33:41 +00:00

Author

I think an MVP here is, "I have a valid FAS account, I get comment access to any card in Taiga" if I need to be assigned a card or have more responsibility I need to get upgraded membership.

Phase II, if determined to be needed can be based on FAS groups.

I think an MVP here is, "I have a valid FAS account, I get comment access to any card in Taiga" if I need to be assigned a card or have more responsibility I need to get upgraded membership. Phase II, if determined to be needed can be based on FAS groups.

kevin commented

2019-05-24 19:38:21 +00:00

Metadata Update from @kevin:

Issue assigned to jperrin
Issue priority set to: Waiting on Assignee (was: Needs Review)

**Metadata Update from @kevin**: - Issue assigned to jperrin - Issue priority set to: Waiting on Assignee (was: Needs Review)

bcotton commented

2019-05-31 17:34:50 +00:00

I think an MVP here is, "I have a valid FAS account, I get comment access to any card in Taiga" if I need to be assigned a card or have more responsibility I need to get upgraded membership.
Phase II, if determined to be needed can be based on FAS groups.

Co-sign.

@bex There may be a workaround: From what I can tell, board admins can add permission to the "external user" role and it doesn't make it as scary as the UI indicates. For example, I gave the "external user" role permission to create issues on a project and from an unauthenticated browser session, I could not create the issue.

> I think an MVP here is, "I have a valid FAS account, I get comment access to any card in Taiga" if I need to be assigned a card or have more responsibility I need to get upgraded membership. > Phase II, if determined to be needed can be based on FAS groups. Co-sign. @bex There may be a workaround: From what I can tell, board admins can add permission to the "external user" role and it doesn't make it as scary as the UI indicates. For example, I gave the "external user" role permission to create issues on a project and from an unauthenticated browser session, I could not create the issue.

bex commented

2019-06-03 09:55:14 +00:00

Author

I have enabled permissions in the Flock and Mentored Projects board per @bcotton 's workaround. We should get some better verification, ideally, but at a minimum document this.

mizdebsk commented

2019-06-18 15:07:16 +00:00

Metadata Update from @mizdebsk:

Issue tagged with: taiga

**Metadata Update from @mizdebsk**: - Issue tagged with: taiga

cverna commented

2020-02-05 06:32:08 +00:00

This was also requested in https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8344

mohanboddu commented

2020-05-19 18:06:22 +00:00

Metadata Update from @mohanboddu:

Assignee reset

**Metadata Update from @mohanboddu**: - Assignee reset

pingou commented

2020-12-04 10:10:31 +00:00

@mattdm @riecatnor do you know who is our current contact for taiga?

This ticket is 2 years old and I'd love to either find a way to address it or just close it.

Thanks!

@mattdm @riecatnor do you know who is our current contact for taiga? This ticket is 2 years old and I'd love to either find a way to address it or just close it. Thanks!

kevin commented

2020-12-04 18:46:46 +00:00

@pingou I have that information... catch me out of ticket and I can get it to you. :)

pingou commented

2020-12-04 20:10:41 +00:00

@kevin do you know if we've contacted them about this request?

smooge commented

2020-12-10 22:26:45 +00:00

Metadata Update from @smooge:

Issue tagged with: low-gain, low-trouble

**Metadata Update from @smooge**: - Issue tagged with: low-gain, low-trouble

smooge commented

2020-12-10 23:11:49 +00:00

Metadata Update from @smooge:

Issue tagged with: ops

**Metadata Update from @smooge**: - Issue tagged with: ops

kevin commented

2020-12-14 19:36:09 +00:00

@pingou I don't seem to have a record of us asking them about this. ;)

Would you like to ask them? support at taiga dot io

Or I can do so if you prefer.

@pingou I don't seem to have a record of us asking them about this. ;) Would you like to ask them? support at taiga dot io Or I can do so if you prefer.

pingou commented

2020-12-14 19:48:43 +00:00

@pingou I don't seem to have a record of us asking them about this. ;)

Would you like to ask them? support at taiga dot io

Or I can do so if you prefer.

You're on PTO so I'll reach out to them and cc admin@fp for record keeping.

Thanks for the info!

> @pingou I don't seem to have a record of us asking them about this. ;) > > Would you like to ask them? support at taiga dot io > > Or I can do so if you prefer. You're on PTO so I'll reach out to them and cc admin@fp for record keeping. Thanks for the info!

pingou commented

2020-12-15 09:29:04 +00:00

Metadata Update from @pingou:

Issue assigned to pingou

**Metadata Update from @pingou**: - Issue assigned to pingou

pingou commented

2020-12-15 14:37:53 +00:00

Turns out the original request for allowing anyone to create top-level project had already been fullfilled.

This together with the fix @bcotton indicated (allowing external users to create tickets) I think solves this ticket.

I'm therefore closing this ticket, tet us know if you need anything else.

Turns out the original request for allowing anyone to create top-level project had already been fullfilled. This together with the fix @bcotton indicated (allowing external users to create tickets) I think solves this ticket. I'm therefore closing this ticket, tet us know if you need anything else.

pingou commented

2020-12-15 14:37:54 +00:00

Metadata Update from @pingou: