Test/fix production ODCS #7144

New issue

Closed

opened 2018-08-03 15:30:51 +00:00 by otaylor · 8 comments

otaylor commented

2018-08-03 15:30:51 +00:00

We're preparing to deploy the Flatpak building code that has been tested in staging to production. This will require a working ODCS instance. The last build on https://odcs.fedoraproject.org/api/1/composes/ never succeeded, so it's probably not working at the moment - though it's possible that the fixes that were done for staging fixed production as a side-effect. I'm thinking the first thing to do would be to try a fresh compose.

cc: @jkaluza @ralph

mizdebsk commented

2018-08-04 14:05:32 +00:00

Metadata Update from @mizdebsk:

Issue tagged with: factory2, odcs

**Metadata Update from @mizdebsk**: - Issue tagged with: factory2, odcs

jkaluza commented

2018-08-09 08:49:49 +00:00

I talked with @otaylor and others on Flock about ODCS in fedora and I will try to be more responsible to ODCS in Fedora.

The reason why ODCS prod is not up to date is that nobody really used it, because the original use-case of testing modules is blocked on #6672. I should still keep it up to date even with nobody using it, but my motivation and time to do that was quite low. Anyway, I will try doing better now when there is actually use-case for ODCS in Fedora. Sorry for the current situation.

I will update it next week once Flock is over.

I talked with @otaylor and others on Flock about ODCS in fedora and I will try to be more responsible to ODCS in Fedora. The reason why ODCS prod is not up to date is that nobody really used it, because the original use-case of testing modules is blocked on #6672. I should still keep it up to date even with nobody using it, but my motivation and time to do that was quite low. Anyway, I will try doing better now when there is actually use-case for ODCS in Fedora. Sorry for the current situation. I will update it next week once Flock is over.

jkaluza commented

2018-08-15 05:18:42 +00:00

I wanted to fix prod ODCS and started with testing it and it seems to be working properly. There is not the latest greatest version deployed, but it seems to work.

jkaluza commented

2018-08-15 05:19:17 +00:00

@otaylor, @cverna: Can you try it yourself and tell me in case there are some issues?

kevin commented

2018-08-15 16:13:12 +00:00

Metadata Update from @kevin:

Issue priority set to: Waiting on Reporter (was: Needs Review)

**Metadata Update from @kevin**: - Issue priority set to: Waiting on Reporter (was: Needs Review)

otaylor commented

2018-08-15 19:32:56 +00:00

Author

Thanks for doing the testing, @jkaluza! - I don't think that I have the permissions to do further testing manually, but the test module build you did seems to have generated the correct content. I think we can close this and open a new issue if something turns up when we try to run OSBS against it.