fedora 40 and above missing on images on data-analysis.fedoraproject.org/csv-reports/images #12426

Open
opened 2025-02-27 13:47:51 +00:00 by lnvso · 8 comments

could fedora 40, 41 and 42 be included in the graphs available at https://data-analysis.fedoraproject.org/csv-reports/images/summary.html

could fedora 40, 41 and 42 be included in the graphs available at https://data-analysis.fedoraproject.org/csv-reports/images/summary.html

Metadata Update from @phsmoura:

  • Issue priority set to: Waiting on Assignee (was: Needs Review)
  • Issue tagged with: low-gain, low-trouble, ops
**Metadata Update from @phsmoura**: - Issue priority set to: Waiting on Assignee (was: Needs Review) - Issue tagged with: low-gain, low-trouble, ops

cc: @james

cc: @james

I know about the numbers behind this, but not what generates the graphs etc.

cc @mattdm ?

I know about the numbers behind this, but not what generates the graphs etc. cc @mattdm ?

This is done via a set of scripts not attached to the work James has been doing. The older data graphs were were to be end-of-lifed around Fedora 40 and replaced with ones generated weekly from the dnf countme data.

The scripts are a python and awk which do a rough count of 1 entry per arch, release,ip/day and then writes out a csv file. That csv file is then run against some rough gnuplot graphs which get updated daily.

All of these were really a short term hack which turned into a permanent solution so updating to newer releases requires a lot of manual hacking of scripts, gnuplot graphs and the existing CSV files to deal with the newer data. At the moment the only data I would consider it useful for is the EPEL-6,8,9 numbers and historical data for other items.

A better solution would be to finish the 'make a graph every week from the countme data' project and keep an older set of pictures with an end-date of when they were last valid (Jun 2024?).

This is done via a set of scripts not attached to the work James has been doing. The older data graphs were were to be end-of-lifed around Fedora 40 and replaced with ones generated weekly from the dnf countme data. The scripts are a python and awk which do a rough count of 1 entry per arch, release,ip/day and then writes out a csv file. That csv file is then run against some rough gnuplot graphs which get updated daily. All of these were really a short term hack which turned into a permanent solution so updating to newer releases requires a lot of manual hacking of scripts, gnuplot graphs and the existing CSV files to deal with the newer data. At the moment the only data I would consider it useful for is the EPEL-6,8,9 numbers and historical data for other items. A better solution would be to finish the 'make a graph every week from the countme data' project and keep an older set of pictures with an end-date of when they were last valid (Jun 2024?).

The hacky stuff appears to be under roles/web-data-analysis/files/
Perhaps it's not hard to just add 40+ for now?

Or perhaps someone can finish the new thing... but I don't even know the status of that? was someone working on it?

The hacky stuff appears to be under roles/web-data-analysis/files/ Perhaps it's not hard to just add 40+ for now? Or perhaps someone can finish the new thing... but I don't even know the status of that? was someone working on it?
Contributor

I thought that the new thing is already finished and running.

I thought that the new thing is already finished and running.

Last year, I was playing with a rewrite of https://pagure.io/brontosaurusifier which includes a frontend for the graphs. I didn't finish it then, but (obviously) I kep the code and it probably wouldn't be hard to wrap it up. I could make PR for stg or communishift, if people want me to push on with it.

Last year, I was playing with a rewrite of https://pagure.io/brontosaurusifier which includes a frontend for the graphs. I didn't finish it then, but (obviously) I kep the code and it probably wouldn't be hard to wrap it up. I could make PR for stg or communishift, if people want me to push on with it.

It would be nice to have for sure...

It would be nice to have for sure...
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
7 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: Infrastructure/fedora-infrastructure#12426
No description provided.