233 lines
9.3 KiB
ReStructuredText
233 lines
9.3 KiB
ReStructuredText
Monitoring / Metrics with Prometheus
|
|
====================================
|
|
|
|
For deployment, we used combination for configuration of prometheus operator and
|
|
application-monitoring operator.
|
|
|
|
Beware, most of the deployment notes could be mostly obsolete in really short time. The
|
|
POC was done on OpenShift 3.11, which limited us in using older version of prometheus
|
|
operator, as well as the no longer maintained application-monitoring operator.
|
|
|
|
In openshift 4.x that we plan to use in the near future, there is supported way
|
|
integrated in the openshift deployment:
|
|
|
|
- https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.7/monitoring/understanding-the-monitoring-stack.html
|
|
- https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.7/monitoring/configuring-the-monitoring-stack.html#configuring-the-monitoring-stack
|
|
- https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.7/monitoring/enabling-monitoring-for-user-defined-projects.html
|
|
|
|
The supported stack is more limited, especially w.r.t. adding user defined pod- and
|
|
service-monitors, but even if we would want to run additional prometheus instances, we
|
|
should be able to skip the instalation of the necessary operators, as all of them should
|
|
already be present.
|
|
|
|
Notes on operator deployment
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
Operator pattern is often used with kubernetes and openshift for more complex
|
|
deployments. Instead of applying all of the configuration to deploy your services, you
|
|
deploy a special, smaller service called operator, that has necessary permissions to
|
|
deploy and configure the complex service. Once the operator is running, instead of
|
|
configuring the service itself with service-specific config-maps, you create operator
|
|
specific kubernetes objects, so-alled CRDs.
|
|
|
|
The deployment of the operator in question was done by configuring the CRDs, roles and
|
|
rolebinding and operator setup:
|
|
|
|
The definitions are as follows: -
|
|
https://github.com/prometheus-operator/prometheus-operator/tree/v0.38.3/example/prometheus-operator-crd
|
|
-
|
|
https://github.com/prometheus-operator/prometheus-operator/tree/v0.38.3/example/rbac/prometheus-operator-crd
|
|
-
|
|
https://github.com/prometheus-operator/prometheus-operator/tree/v0.38.3/example/rbac/prometheus-operator
|
|
|
|
Once the operator is correctly running, you just define a prometheus crd and it will
|
|
create prometheus deployment for you.
|
|
|
|
The POC lives in
|
|
https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/blob/main/f/playbooks/openshift-apps/application-monitoring.yml
|
|
|
|
Notes on application monitoring operator deployment
|
|
---------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
The application-monitoring operator was created to solve the integration of Prometheus,
|
|
Alertmanager and Grafana. After you configure it, it configures the relevant operators
|
|
responsible for these services.
|
|
|
|
The most interesting difference between configuring this shared operator, compared to
|
|
configuring these operators individually is that it configures some of the integrations,
|
|
and it integrates well with openshifts auth system through oauth proxy.
|
|
|
|
The biggest drawback is, that the application-monitoring operator is orphanned project,
|
|
but because it mostly configures other operators, it is relatively simple to just
|
|
recreate the configuration for both prometheus and alertmanager to be deployed, and
|
|
deploy the prometheus and alertmanager operators without the help or the
|
|
application-monitoring operator.
|
|
|
|
Notes on persistence
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
Prometheus by default expects to have a writable /prometheus folder, that can serve as
|
|
persistent storage.
|
|
|
|
For the persistent volume to work for this purpose, it has to **needs to have
|
|
POSIX-compliant filesystem**, and NFS we currently have configured is not. This is
|
|
discussed in the `operational aspects
|
|
<https://prometheus.io/docs/prometheus/latest/storage/#operational-aspects>`_ of
|
|
Prometheus documentation
|
|
|
|
The easiest supported way to have a POSIX-compliant `filesystem is to setup
|
|
local-storage
|
|
<https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.11/install_config/configuring_local.html>`_
|
|
in the cluster.
|
|
|
|
In 4.x versions of OpenShift `there is a local-storage-operator
|
|
<https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.7/storage/persistent_storage/persistent-storage-local.html>`_
|
|
for this purpose.
|
|
|
|
This is the simplest way to have working persistence, but it prevents us to have
|
|
multiple instanes across openshift nodes, as the pod is using the underlying filesystem
|
|
on the node.
|
|
|
|
To ask the operator to create persisted prometheus, you specify in its configuration
|
|
i.e.:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block::
|
|
|
|
storage:
|
|
volumeClaimTemplate:
|
|
spec:
|
|
retention: 24h
|
|
storageClassName: local
|
|
resources:
|
|
requests:
|
|
storage: 10Gi
|
|
|
|
By default retention is set to 24 hours and can be over-ridden
|
|
|
|
Notes on long term storage
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
|
|
Usually, prometheus itself is setup to store its metrics for shorter ammount of time,
|
|
and it is expected that for longterm storage and analysis, there is some other storage
|
|
solution, such as influxdb or timescaledb.
|
|
|
|
We are currently running a POC that sychronizes Prometheus with Timescaledb (running on
|
|
Postgresql) through a middleware service called `promscale
|
|
<https://github.com/timescale/promscale>`_ .
|
|
|
|
Promscale just needs an access to a appropriate postgresql database: and can be
|
|
configured through PROMSCALE_DB_PASSWORD, PROMSCALE_DB_HOST.
|
|
|
|
By default it will ensure the database has timescaledb installed and configures its
|
|
database automatically.
|
|
|
|
We setup prometheus with directive to use promscale service as a backend:
|
|
https://github.com/timescale/promscale
|
|
|
|
.. code-block::
|
|
|
|
remote_write:
|
|
- url: "http://promscale:9201/write"
|
|
remote_read:
|
|
- url: "http://promscale:9201/read"
|
|
|
|
Notes on auxialiary services
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
As prometheus is primarily targeted to collect metrics from services that have beein
|
|
instrumented to expose them, if your service is not instrumented, or it is not a
|
|
service, i.e. a batch-job, you need an adapter to help you with the metrics collection.
|
|
|
|
There are two services that help with this.
|
|
|
|
- `blackbox exporter <https://github.com/prometheus/blackbox_exporter>`_ to monitor
|
|
services that have not been instrumented based on querying public a.p.i.
|
|
- `push gateway
|
|
<https://prometheus.io/docs/practices/pushing/#should-i-be-using-the-pushgateway>`_
|
|
that helps collect information from batch-jobs
|
|
|
|
Maintaining the push-gateway can be relegated to the application developer, as it is
|
|
lightweight, and by colloecting metrics from the namespace it is running in, the data
|
|
will be correctly labeled.
|
|
|
|
With blackbox exporter, it can be beneficial to have it running as prometheus side-car,
|
|
in simmilar fashion, as we configure oauth-proxy, adding this to the containers section
|
|
of the prometheus definition:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block::
|
|
|
|
- name: blackbox-exporter
|
|
volumeMounts:
|
|
- name: configmap-blackbox
|
|
mountPath: /etc/blackbox-config
|
|
- mountPath: /etc/tls/private
|
|
name: secret-prometheus-k8s-tls
|
|
image: quay.io/prometheus/blackbox-exporter:4.4
|
|
args:
|
|
- '--config.file=/etc/blackbox-config/blackbox.yml'
|
|
ports:
|
|
- containerPort: 9115
|
|
name: blackbox
|
|
|
|
We can then instruct what is to be monitored through the configmap-blackbox, you can
|
|
find `relevant examples
|
|
<https://github.com/prometheus/blackbox_exporter/blob/master/example.yml>` in the
|
|
project repo. Beause blackox exporter is in the same pod, we need to use the
|
|
additional-scrape-config to add it in.
|
|
|
|
Notes on alerting
|
|
-----------------
|
|
|
|
Prometheus as is, can have rules configured that trigger alerts, once a specific query
|
|
evaluates to true. The definition of the rule is explained in the companion docs for
|
|
prometheus for developers and can be created in the namespace of the running
|
|
application.
|
|
|
|
Here, we need to focus what happens with alert after prometheus realizes it should fire
|
|
it, based on a rule.
|
|
|
|
In prometheus crd definition, there is a section about the alert-manager that is
|
|
supposed to manage the forwarding of these alerts.
|
|
|
|
.. code-block::
|
|
|
|
alerting:
|
|
alertmanagers:
|
|
- bearerTokenFile: /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount/token
|
|
name: alertmanager-service
|
|
namespace: application-monitoring
|
|
port: web
|
|
scheme: https
|
|
tlsConfig:
|
|
caFile: /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount/service-ca.crt
|
|
serverName: alertmanager-service.application-monitoring.svc
|
|
|
|
We already have alertmanager running and configured by the alertmanager-operator.
|
|
Alertmanager itself is really simplistic with a simple ui and api, that allows for
|
|
silencing an alert for a given ammount of time.
|
|
|
|
It is expected that the actual user-interaction is happening elsewhere, either through
|
|
services like OpsGenie, or through i.e. `integration with zabbix
|
|
<https://devopy.io/setting-up-zabbix-alertmanager-integration/>`_
|
|
|
|
More of a build-it yourself solution is to use i.e. https://karma-dashboard.io/, but we
|
|
haven't tried any of these as the part of our POC.
|
|
|
|
To be able to be notified of the alert, you need to have the `correct reciever
|
|
configuration <https://prometheus.io/docs/alerting/latest/configuration/#email_config>`_
|
|
in the alertmanagers secret:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block::
|
|
|
|
global:
|
|
resolve_timeout: 5m
|
|
route:
|
|
group_by: ['job']
|
|
group_wait: 10s
|
|
group_interval: 10s
|
|
repeat_interval: 30m
|
|
receiver: 'email'
|
|
receivers:
|
|
- name: 'email'
|
|
email_configs:
|
|
- to: 'asaleh@redhat.com'
|