diff --git a/docs/fmn/april2022/index.rst b/docs/fmn/april2022/index.rst
index e21e95e..2855106 100644
--- a/docs/fmn/april2022/index.rst
+++ b/docs/fmn/april2022/index.rst
@@ -23,9 +23,9 @@ The current version of FMN was implemented uses the deprecated fedmsg bus, not t
Additionally, the FMN code is deeply integrated with the fedmsg ecosystem (e.g. the configuration setup for FMN is kept in the fedmsg.d/ directory)
UI
-~~
+~~
after adhoc discussions with the development community one of the major issues is the FMN web UI:
-
+
* The interface for creating new filters is complicated and confusing.
* Users have to define filters seperately for different destentations (i.e. email and IRC) This is due to how the database is designed.
@@ -55,8 +55,8 @@ Fedora infrastructure: packages, containers, modules, flatpaks.
Stakeholders
------------
-- [@devel list question to gather
- requirements](https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/SGGM3XPGQX77SEDOLEI376SZVRFKTXGR/)
+- `@devel list question to gather
+ requirements `__
- `Fedora Discussion
thread `__
- Also ask the @mindshare / @ambassadors for the needs of non-packagers
@@ -148,10 +148,8 @@ Misc
Suggested design
----------------
-.. image:: https://i.imgur.com/SsqFphF.png
+.. image:: workflow.png
-(`graph
-source `__)
Data model and configuration
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
@@ -361,8 +359,8 @@ making it harder to figure out who is using defaults.
Skillsets
---------
-* fedora messaging
-* Web application UI
+* fedora messaging
+* Web application UI
* Python (database)
* Rabbitmq (used in the backend of FMN and could be useful to know)
* Openshift
diff --git a/docs/fmn/april2022/workflow.png b/docs/fmn/april2022/workflow.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dfba389
Binary files /dev/null and b/docs/fmn/april2022/workflow.png differ