Add some open questions regarding timescaledb
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@pingoured.fr>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8841281325
commit
8e99d2c028
1 changed files with 9 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -62,3 +62,12 @@ After converting the `messages` table to use timescaledb, we've realized that
|
|||
timescaledb uses table partitioning as well.
|
||||
This leads to the same issue with the foreign key constraints that we have seen
|
||||
in the plain partitioning approach we took.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Open questions
|
||||
--------------
|
||||
|
||||
* How will upgrading the postgresql version with the timescaledb plugin look like?
|
||||
|
||||
It looks like the timescaledb folks are involved enough in postgresql itself that
|
||||
we think things will work, but we have not had on-hands experience with it.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue