Add some open questions regarding timescaledb

Signed-off-by: Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@pingoured.fr>
This commit is contained in:
Pierre-Yves Chibon 2021-02-10 14:03:38 +01:00
parent 8841281325
commit 8e99d2c028

View file

@ -62,3 +62,12 @@ After converting the `messages` table to use timescaledb, we've realized that
timescaledb uses table partitioning as well.
This leads to the same issue with the foreign key constraints that we have seen
in the plain partitioning approach we took.
Open questions
--------------
* How will upgrading the postgresql version with the timescaledb plugin look like?
It looks like the timescaledb folks are involved enough in postgresql itself that
we think things will work, but we have not had on-hands experience with it.