From 8841281325d476b984f7c81d2c052ee5d1e7f815 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@pingoured.fr>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 10:19:05 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Add some findings about timescaledb

Signed-off-by: Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@pingoured.fr>
---
 docs/datanommer_datagrepper/pg_timescaledb.rst | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/docs/datanommer_datagrepper/pg_timescaledb.rst b/docs/datanommer_datagrepper/pg_timescaledb.rst
index b13d670..4cfec50 100644
--- a/docs/datanommer_datagrepper/pg_timescaledb.rst
+++ b/docs/datanommer_datagrepper/pg_timescaledb.rst
@@ -53,3 +53,12 @@ Finally, you can check that the extension was activated for your database:
 ::
     $ sudo -u postgres psql <database_name>
     \dx
+
+
+Findings
+--------
+
+After converting the `messages` table to use timescaledb, we've realized that
+timescaledb uses table partitioning as well.
+This leads to the same issue with the foreign key constraints that we have seen
+in the plain partitioning approach we took.