Docs/quick-docs
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 48 Pull requests 1 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

getting-started-guide in Quick Docs intro is out of place #643

New issue
Open
opened 2023-10-15 21:02:20 +00:00 by hankuoffroad · 7 comments
hankuoffroad commented 2023-10-15 21:02:20 +00:00
Contributor
Copy link

Getting started with Fedora looks out of place. Isn't Workstation a correct place to be in?

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/getting-started-guide/

Getting started with Fedora looks out of place. Isn't Workstation a correct place to be in? https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/getting-started-guide/
ankursinha commented 2023-10-16 09:09:51 +00:00
Contributor
Copy link

I think it's meant to be edition agnostic---it kind of explains the broader high level view. However, I don't see a lot of useful information in there at the moment. The bits on Gnome apps etc. are not relevant there (and perhaps out of date too). So that section certainly needs to be removed.

Is there value in having a page that explains "Linux" and "root" and so on?

So, the page can either be removed, or it needs some heavy re-doing.

I think it's meant to be edition agnostic---it kind of explains the broader high level view. However, I don't see a lot of useful information in there at the moment. The bits on Gnome apps etc. are not relevant there (and perhaps out of date too). So that section certainly needs to be removed. Is there value in having a page that explains "Linux" and "root" and so on? So, the page can either be removed, or it needs some heavy re-doing.
ankursinha commented 2023-10-16 09:09:51 +00:00
Contributor
Copy link

Metadata Update from @ankursinha:

  • Issue priority set to: needs review (was: awaiting triage)
  • Issue tagged with: bug, help wanted, improvement
**Metadata Update from @ankursinha**: - Issue priority set to: needs review (was: awaiting triage) - Issue tagged with: bug, help wanted, improvement
hankuoffroad commented 2023-10-16 20:48:26 +00:00
Author
Contributor
Copy link

I think it's meant to be edition agnostic---it kind of explains the broader high level view. However, I don't see a lot of useful information in there at the moment. The bits on Gnome apps etc. are not relevant there (and perhaps out of date too). So that section certainly needs to be removed.

Is there value in having a page that explains "Linux" and "root" and so on?

So, the page can either be removed, or it needs some heavy re-doing.

@pboy I don't recall this getting started guide was in Quick Docs before. Is there any reason this article was back to life? The articles in QD should be edition agnostic as @ankursinha noted. Thanks in advance.

> I think it's meant to be edition agnostic---it kind of explains the broader high level view. However, I don't see a lot of useful information in there at the moment. The bits on Gnome apps etc. are not relevant there (and perhaps out of date too). So that section certainly needs to be removed. > > Is there value in having a page that explains "Linux" and "root" and so on? > > So, the page can either be removed, or it needs some heavy re-doing. @pboy I don't recall this getting started guide was in Quick Docs before. Is there any reason this article was back to life? The articles in QD should be edition agnostic as @ankursinha noted. Thanks in advance.
ankursinha commented 2023-11-21 06:16:42 +00:00
Contributor
Copy link

Assigning to pboy for the moment.

Assigning to pboy for the moment.
ankursinha commented 2023-11-21 06:16:43 +00:00
Contributor
Copy link

Metadata Update from @ankursinha:

  • Issue assigned to pboy
**Metadata Update from @ankursinha**: - Issue assigned to pboy
pboy commented 2024-06-15 11:06:13 +00:00
Copy link

Yes, I think it kind of out of place here. Some parts could be moved to the general Fedora introduction. I add it to my todo.

Yes, I think it kind of out of place here. Some parts could be moved to the general Fedora introduction. I add it to my todo.
hankuoffroad commented 2024-07-14 09:03:51 +00:00
Author
Contributor
Copy link

Yes, I think it kind of out of place here. Some parts could be moved to the general Fedora introduction. I add it to my todo.

Hi, Peter thanks for your heads-up. I hope you are dong well.
Refer to the discussion around Quick Docs.

https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/ideas-and-collaboration-for-quick-docs/124809

We might want to revise the title of the article to add introductory paragraphs to what Quick Docs is about in more details such as;

  • Scope and definition
  • Process/step improvements
  • Removal of tangential/irrelevant information ( Scope of Q/D )
  • New Quick Docs !

as suggested by two active Ask Fedora contributors: @hamrheadcorvette @ilikelinux

> Yes, I think it kind of out of place here. Some parts could be moved to the general Fedora introduction. I add it to my todo. Hi, Peter thanks for your heads-up. I hope you are dong well. Refer to the discussion around Quick Docs. https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/ideas-and-collaboration-for-quick-docs/124809 We might want to revise the title of the article to add introductory paragraphs to what Quick Docs is about in more details such as; - Scope and definition - Process/step improvements - Removal of tangential/irrelevant information ( Scope of Q/D ) - New Quick Docs ! as suggested by two active Ask Fedora contributors: @hamrheadcorvette @ilikelinux
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
Branches Tags
main
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels   
bug

Something isn't working

  
Closed As
complete
Closed with the reason of complete

  
Closed As
duplicate
Closed with the reason of duplicate

  
Closed As
insufficient data
Closed with the reason of insufficient data

  
Closed As
moved
Closed with the reason of moved

  
Closed As
not possible
Closed with the reason of not possible

  
Closed As
out of scope
Closed with the reason of out of scope

  
Closed As
stale
Closed with the reason of stale

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers (if you want to get involved, try working on one of these!)

  
help wanted

Anyone is welcome to help us with this!

  
improvement

Improves on something that already exists

  
needs changes

Needs changes or fixes before closing

  
needs committer review

Needs review by a person with committer privileges or a subject-matter expert (SME)

  
needs info

Extra attention or information needed

  
new change

Adds new capabilities or functionality

  
Priority
awaiting triage
Priority of awaiting triage

  
Priority
needs review
Priority of needs review

  
Priority
next meeting
Priority of next meeting

  
Priority
waiting on assignee
Priority of waiting on assignee

  
Priority
waiting on external
Priority of waiting on external

No labels
bug
Closed As
complete
Closed As
duplicate
Closed As
insufficient data
Closed As
moved
Closed As
not possible
Closed As
out of scope
Closed As
stale
good first issue
help wanted
improvement
needs changes
needs committer review
needs info
new change
Priority
awaiting triage
Priority
needs review
Priority
next meeting
Priority
waiting on assignee
Priority
waiting on external
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: Docs/quick-docs#643
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?