Move " Disk Encryption User Guide" from wiki to quick-docs #230

Closed
opened 2020-03-27 19:54:43 +00:00 by jflory7 · 19 comments
Member

Recently I was working with encrypted disks on Fedora and my search results brought me to this wiki page:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Disk_Encryption_User_Guide

It was pretty helpful, even though I only used a narrow subset of what is published there. It would be great to get this moved in the Quick Docs site and set up a wiki page redirect to include that content along with the rest of the Quick Docs content!

Recently I was working with encrypted disks on Fedora and my search results brought me to this wiki page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Disk_Encryption_User_Guide It was pretty helpful, even though I only used a narrow subset of what is published there. It would be great to get this moved in the Quick Docs site and set up a wiki page redirect to include that content along with the rest of the Quick Docs content!
Author
Member

Metadata Update from @jflory7:

  • Issue tagged with: help wanted, new change
**Metadata Update from @jflory7**: - Issue tagged with: help wanted, new change
Contributor

@jflory7 I can pick this up. Could you assign it to me?

@jflory7 I can pick this up. Could you assign it to me?
Contributor

Metadata Update from @pbokoc:

  • Issue assigned to pbokoc
**Metadata Update from @pbokoc**: - Issue assigned to pbokoc
Contributor

Metadata Update from @pbokoc:

  • Issue assigned to t0xic0der (was: pbokoc)
  • Issue priority set to: waiting on assignee (was: awaiting triage)
**Metadata Update from @pbokoc**: - Issue assigned to t0xic0der (was: pbokoc) - Issue priority set to: waiting on assignee (was: awaiting triage)
Contributor

Done. :)

Done. :)
Contributor
Hi @pbokoc, please review this [#241 Created "Disk Encryption User Guide" quick-docs](https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/quick-docs/pull-request/241)
Contributor

@jflory7 @t0xic0der : We should've checked this before @t0xic0der did all the work:

i see that the wiki page was update in April, so it's quite actively maintained. I think it'll be a good idea to reach out to the writers of the wiki page to confirm that they're happy with updating the quick-docs page instead of the wiki? Otherwise we end up with an up to date wiki page, and an outdated quick-doc.

@jflory7 @t0xic0der : We should've checked this before @t0xic0der did all the work: i see that the wiki page was update in April, so it's quite actively maintained. I think it'll be a good idea to reach out to the writers of the wiki page to confirm that they're happy with updating the quick-docs page instead of the wiki? Otherwise we end up with an up to date wiki page, and an outdated quick-doc.
Contributor

@ankursinha As a matter of fact, I see a LUKS encryption adoc already existing here in the articles but it has not been updated since long. Wiki is an entirely different story though.

@ankursinha As a matter of fact, I see a LUKS encryption adoc already existing here in the articles but it has not been updated since long. Wiki is an entirely different story though.
Contributor

Does this still have to be completed?

Does this still have to be completed?
Contributor

I think there's #241 with an initial draft, but yes, this one still needs completion.

I think there's #241 with an initial draft, but yes, this one still needs completion.
Contributor

Can you please assign and link me to wiki?

Can you please assign and link me to wiki?
Contributor

Assigned, here's the wiki page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Disk_Encryption_User_Guide

Can you also please take a look at the work already done in #241 and incorporate it too where possible?

Assigned, here's the wiki page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Disk_Encryption_User_Guide Can you also please take a look at the work already done in #241 and incorporate it too where possible?
Contributor

Metadata Update from @ankursinha:

  • Issue assigned to mmccabe4 (was: t0xic0der)
**Metadata Update from @ankursinha**: - Issue assigned to mmccabe4 (was: t0xic0der)
Contributor

I believe that the file can be closed. The #241 is still a direct copy of
the Wiki, it looks like no additional changes have been made.

On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:20 AM Ankur Sinha pagure@pagure.io wrote:

ankursinha added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Assigned, here's the wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Disk_Encryption_User_Guide

Can you also please take a look at the work already done in #241 and
incorporate it too where possible?
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/quick-docs/issue/230

I believe that the file can be closed. The #241 is still a direct copy of the Wiki, it looks like no additional changes have been made. On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:20 AM Ankur Sinha <pagure@pagure.io> wrote: > > ankursinha added a new comment to an issue you are following: > `` > Assigned, here's the wiki page: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Disk_Encryption_User_Guide > > Can you also please take a look at the work already done in #241 and > incorporate it too where possible? > `` > > To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email > https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/quick-docs/issue/230 >
Contributor

I believe that the file can be closed. The #241 is still a direct copy of
the Wiki, it looks like no additional changes have been made.

Cool. Would it be easier for you if we merge that PR and then you review it and make modifications, or would you prefer to start from scratch?

> I believe that the file can be closed. The #241 is still a direct copy of > the Wiki, it looks like no additional changes have been made. Cool. Would it be easier for you if we merge that PR and then you review it and make modifications, or would you prefer to start from scratch?
Contributor

I think starting from scratch would be good, I can move it over and get
practice with a new document like that. What method is used to submit the
new document?

On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 5:09 AM Ankur Sinha pagure@pagure.io wrote:

ankursinha added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``

I believe that the file can be closed. The #241 is still a direct copy of
the Wiki, it looks like no additional changes have been made.

Cool. Would it be easier for you if we merge that PR and then you review
it and make modifications, or would you prefer to start from scratch?

``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/quick-docs/issue/230

I think starting from scratch would be good, I can move it over and get practice with a new document like that. What method is used to submit the new document? On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 5:09 AM Ankur Sinha <pagure@pagure.io> wrote: > > ankursinha added a new comment to an issue you are following: > `` > > I believe that the file can be closed. The #241 is still a direct copy of > > the Wiki, it looks like no additional changes have been made. > > > Cool. Would it be easier for you if we merge that PR and then you review > it and make modifications, or would you prefer to start from scratch? > > `` > > To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email > https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/quick-docs/issue/230 >
Contributor

Cool, sounds good. I'll close that PR now.

The new document is also added via a pull request, so same process as editing existing pages.

Cool, sounds good. I'll close that PR now. The new document is also added via a pull request, so same process as editing existing pages.

I close this ticket because obviously everything is done, and no additional action required nor on the way.

If there is still something to do, please don't hesitate to create a new ticket with a plan revised accordingly.

I close this ticket because obviously everything is done, and no additional action required nor on the way. If there is still something to do, please don't hesitate to create a new ticket with a plan revised accordingly.

Metadata Update from @pboy:

  • Issue close_status updated to: duplicate
  • Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
**Metadata Update from @pboy**: - Issue close_status updated to: duplicate - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
6 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: Docs/quick-docs#230
No description provided.