"Using adobe flash" needs review #184

New issue

Closed

opened 2020-03-02 19:40:26 +00:00 by ankursinha · 6 comments

ankursinha commented

2020-03-02 19:40:26 +00:00

Contributor

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/using-adobe-flash/ was autoconverted and needs review

jflory7 commented

2020-03-27 19:52:58 +00:00

Member

If this gets rewritten, might be a good idea to drop a note to the Negativo17 repo for Flash:

https://negativo17.org/adobe-flash-plugin/

I've used this repo for Flash since F22 or F23 since it packages Flash in accordance to Fedora packaging guidelines. Not sure if the packages direct from Adobe do so.

If this gets rewritten, might be a good idea to drop a note to the Negativo17 repo for Flash: https://negativo17.org/adobe-flash-plugin/ I've used this repo for Flash since F22 or F23 since it packages Flash in accordance to Fedora packaging guidelines. Not sure if the packages direct from Adobe do so.

richardgreg commented

2020-10-24 16:50:42 +00:00

Contributor

Metadata Update from @richardgreg:

Issue assigned to richardgreg

**Metadata Update from @richardgreg**: - Issue assigned to richardgreg

hhlp commented

2021-01-30 13:18:45 +00:00

Contributor

according to this note:

As Adobe Flash ended support at the end of 2020 and apparently stopped working on 12 January 2021, the time has probably come to remove any references to it from quick docs.
Source: https://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/end-of-life.html

as a @couchfox suggests...

Regards.,

according to this note: As Adobe Flash ended support at the end of 2020 and apparently stopped working on 12 January 2021, the time has probably come to remove any references to it from quick docs. Source: https://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/end-of-life.html as a @couchfox suggests... Regards.,

hhlp commented

2021-01-30 15:17:16 +00:00

Contributor

Metadata Update from @hhlp: